HomeHomeFAQRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 310. Revision of 212.

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Daniel277

avatar

Posts : 174
Join date : 2011-03-16

PostSubject: 310. Revision of 212.   Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:28 am

"212. Potential citizens will stay in the Gulag for no less than one week."

into

"310. Potential citizens will stay in the Gulag for no less than one week. This period may be shortened or removed by a unanimous CPC vote."
Back to top Go down
Ignus
Admin
avatar

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-03-13
Age : 33
Location : London

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am

I vote yes
Back to top Go down
http://forum.melsonia.com
Artemis



Posts : 79
Join date : 2011-06-14

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:34 am

The miner's union votes no
Back to top Go down
Belletor

avatar

Posts : 89
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 26

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:13 pm

Sure sure, more power to me and whatnot.

I vote yes.
Back to top Go down
Alexander Matusik

avatar

Posts : 25
Join date : 2011-06-12

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Captain votes yes
Back to top Go down
Kaizuul

avatar

Posts : 64
Join date : 2011-07-10

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:29 pm

Artemis wrote:
The miner's union votes no

This is the first I've seen/heard of this revision. I like the idea, personally.
Back to top Go down
Artemis



Posts : 79
Join date : 2011-06-14

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:15 am

Richard Head II wrote:
Artemis wrote:
The miner's union votes no

This is the first I've seen/heard of this revision. I like the idea, personally.
The vote was placed when a decent amount of time had passed, and all miners had either submitted votes or abstained (Aka, only I voted).
Back to top Go down
Daniel277

avatar

Posts : 174
Join date : 2011-03-16

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:48 pm

did you offer a chance for the miners to vote in the miners union section at all?
Back to top Go down
The Grue



Posts : 14
Join date : 2011-04-14
Location : A place

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Sat Oct 08, 2011 8:33 pm

Clothier's Union sees the value here and votes yes.
Back to top Go down
Kaizuul

avatar

Posts : 64
Join date : 2011-07-10

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:36 am

Daniel277 wrote:
did you offer a chance for the miners to vote in the miners union section at all?

Could be my fault.. I did just recently return.
Back to top Go down
Ignus
Admin
avatar

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-03-13
Age : 33
Location : London

PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:45 pm

Passed

This has been done in accordance with:

113. A citizen's non-participation in a law-change will result in the forfeit of their vote. A citizen always has the option to forfeit a vote.

216. Votes are formally submitted as a reply to the thread concerning and containing the prospective law change(s) and can be altered until the final vote is submitted or a second parliament passes, whichever is sooner.
Back to top Go down
http://forum.melsonia.com
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: 310. Revision of 212.   

Back to top Go down
 
310. Revision of 212.
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» super-amazing match for stockfish Sep 07 revision 4 - part 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: The Republic :: House of Peers-
Jump to: